Blogs

pages-image

GAYATRI BALASAMY vs M/S ISG NOVASOFT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED (C.A. No. …

GAYATRI BALASAMY vs M/S ISG NOVASOFT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED (C.A. No. 6178-6179/2025) Date of Decision :30-4-2025 SUBJECT: Power of the Court to modify an Arbitral Award under Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. DECISION: The Supreme Court, by a 4:1 majority, held that courts possess a limited power under Section 34 and 37 of the 1996 Act to modify an arbitral award. The majority also affirmed the courts' power to modify post-award interest where justified. Chief Justice Khanna authored the majority judgment, while Justice Viswanathan wrote a dissenting opinion, holding that courts cannot modify an arbitral award.

  • June 19, 2025
  • Created By: Dr.Deepakshi Joshi

Supreme Court of India applies well established principles of Res …

Supreme Court of India applies well established principles of Res Judicata and put an end to long legal property dispute in Sulthan Said Ibrahim v. State of Karnataka Appeal No. 7108 of 2025. The judgment once again sheds light on the evils of procedural abuse and strengthened the concept of finality in litigation.

  • June 16, 2025
  • Created By: DIPALI NABIYAL

Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana, 2025 INSC 162 (Date …

Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana, 2025 INSC 162 (Date of decision:7-2-2025) In this case, Vihaan Kumar was arrested for serious criminal charges but challenged the arrest, saying the police didn’t tell him why he was being arrested, violating Article 22(1) of the Constitution. He also said he was handcuffed and chained to a hospital bed, which insulted his dignity under Article 21. The Supreme Court found that the police failed to properly inform Vihaan about the reason for arrest, which is a basic right guaranteed by the Constitution. It said just telling his wife or making vague diary entries wasn’t enough. Also, chaining him in the hospital without justification was inhuman and unconstitutional. The Court ruled that such a flawed arrest couldn’t be fixed by later legal steps like remand or chargesheets. It ordered Vihaan’s immediate release and asked the Haryana government to issue clear rules against such treatment in hospitals. The judgment strongly upheld the importance of personal liberty and dignity.

  • June 12, 2025
  • Created By: Dr.Deepakshi Joshi

URMILA DIXIT v. SUNIL SHARAN DIXIT DATE OF DECISION: 02-01-2025 …

URMILA DIXIT v. SUNIL SHARAN DIXIT DATE OF DECISION: 02-01-2025 (2025 INSC 20) SUBJECT: Right of a senior citizen to claim back their transferred property under the Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of the Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. JUSTICES: Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Chudalayil T. Ravikumar

  • June 12, 2025
  • Created By: Dr.Deepakshi Joshi

Punishment of accused by Court

Punishment of accused by Court

  • June 11, 2025
  • Created By: Saleem Ahmad

Supreme Court on January 15, 2025 (Wednesday), whole issuing a …

Supreme Court on January 15, 2025 (Wednesday), whole issuing a set of directions for construction of toilets facilities in court premises across India, noted that the same would provide privacy and threat to ladies and transgender persons. Rajib Kalita Vs. Union of India & Ors. W.P. (C) No. 538/2023

  • Jan. 16, 2025
  • Created By: DIPALI NABIYAL

As humanity's ambitions stretch beyond Earth's atmosphere, new legal and …

As humanity's ambitions stretch beyond Earth's atmosphere, new legal and ethical challenges arise in the unexplored realm of space. How do we balance international cooperation and national interests while preventing a new kind of arms race in the stars? What rights do corporations and nations have over celestial resources? And as we dream of colonizing Mars, how do we safeguard the rights of future space settlers?

  • Oct. 28, 2024
  • Created By: SHIV TANAY JOSHI - LLB22026